V8supercars 2016
Forum rules
Please be careful about posting results in threads discussing current sporting events.
Where possible can the first person to start a thread on an event add *spoilers included* (or similar) to the thread title so that all discussion on the event is kept in one place and readers are aware that the content may contain the results.
Please be careful about posting results in threads discussing current sporting events.
Where possible can the first person to start a thread on an event add *spoilers included* (or similar) to the thread title so that all discussion on the event is kept in one place and readers are aware that the content may contain the results.
- w00dsy
- The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
- Posts: 24457
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
- Location: incognito
Re: V8supercars 2016
I think they have a decent case but I don't want to set the result changed after the fact.
- norbs
- fucking right wing vegan lesbian
- Posts: 24220
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: V8supercars 2016
I had a really quick look at 1 point early and I thought it said a Vulva was leading? I can only imagine the reception had they won.
Sarc ; my second favourite type of gasm.
- Duke
- Dukester Maldonado
- Posts: 11460
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:33 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: RE: Re: V8supercars 2016
That is a good point Shaun, I failed to see that the 15' penalty was given for the initial borked overtake attempt & nothing to do with the botched redress.Shaun wrote:While what you say is correct supercars told redbull the 15 sec time penalty was soley for the hit with scotty and nothing to do with the accident after. Therefore redbull have a case he should get the win and a 10 point deduction if they followed the rules they madeDuke wrote:Umm yes the initial incident my have been level 1 but the redress is what caused the bigger incident. That took 2 cars off track & is why I still believe a PLP was what should have been issued. (without actually reading the V8SC rule book).
Be interesting to see what comes of the protest if there has indeed been an incorrect implementation of the rules.
Just not sure there would be anything specific to cover that situation though.
I do feel for JW as he was trying to do the correct thing & it was really a misjudgment by all parties involved.
Hence McLaughlin getting a post race penalty for his part in it.
In that case JW should have got 2 penalties.
Dukester
norbs diplomacy lesson 101: "If I was putting words in your mouth, you'd know."
norbs diplomacy lesson 101: "If I was putting words in your mouth, you'd know."
- w00dsy
- The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
- Posts: 24457
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
- Location: incognito
Re: V8supercars 2016
McLaughlin docked 25 points for dangerous re-entry http://www.supercars.com/news/champions ... -re-enter/
- Jiminee
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 pm
- Location: Whyalla Proud
Re: V8supercars 2016
I believe the appeal is an effort to have the 15 second penalty reduced to 10 seconds, in line with what Rick Kelly got earlier in the day.
I just dont see them changing the result of the race, they are hugely reluctant to do that, but that 5 less seconds would be worth a fair few points and since Whincup is a championship contender so those points are worth the ten grand plus GST.
Interesting though that the first 4 cars across the line yesterday were 888 built and the first 4 cars in the Championship are all from 888. That is some domination right there.
(Of course the incident in questions took out the two leading non 888 cars so that played a big part in the result.)
I just dont see them changing the result of the race, they are hugely reluctant to do that, but that 5 less seconds would be worth a fair few points and since Whincup is a championship contender so those points are worth the ten grand plus GST.
Interesting though that the first 4 cars across the line yesterday were 888 built and the first 4 cars in the Championship are all from 888. That is some domination right there.
(Of course the incident in questions took out the two leading non 888 cars so that played a big part in the result.)
XLV SPORT
- Montey
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 6:54 pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Contact:
Re: V8supercars 2016
- When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
- If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!
- If youre paddling upstream in a canoe and a wheel falls off, how many pancakes fit in a doghouse? None! Icecream doesn't have bones!!!
- Jiminee
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 pm
- Location: Whyalla Proud
-
- Posts: 4336
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 1:13 pm
- Location: Darwin
Re: V8supercars 2016
If like Shaun says the penalty for this sort of incident is to deduct points from their license and they've just decided on the day to give time penalties then Jamie is the real winner of the race.
- KNAPPO
- Master artist
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 1:26 am
- Location: North of the dog fence, Adelaide.
Re: V8supercars 2016
Glad the appeal was dismissed. Nothing against Jamie but it was nice to see a new winner of the 1000 for a change.
Life is hard...but, life is harder when you're dumb.
- Exar Kun
- Sensible Mick
- Posts: 11331
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:46 pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: V8supercars 2016
Dismissed on a technicality though. Also glad that the winner on the day (albeit not first across the line) is still the winner, however.
"If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate!"
-
- Smooth Lubricator.
- Posts: 12070
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: The wet central coast
Re: V8supercars 2016
This and that the same thing was penalised 10 seconds, earlier...it's just inconsistent and unprofessional. (if true)Sarsippius wrote:If like Shaun says the penalty for this sort of incident is to deduct points from their license and they've just decided on the day to give time penalties then Jamie is the real winner of the race.
Surprise, no sig. Now there is. Or is there?
- NeilPearson
- Prize Winning ARSE
- Posts: 7278
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Neil'sville
- Contact:
Re: V8supercars 2016
That's just v8supercars officials they have never been consistent
- r8response
- Cry baby
- Posts: 8565
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 6:51 pm
- Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD
Re: V8supercars 2016
At least they're consistent in not being consistentNeilPearson wrote:That's just v8supercars officials they have never been consistent
- wobblysauce
- Seen it, Done it, Invented it!
- Posts: 10489
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:53 am
- Location: On an Island in the south
Re: V8supercars 2016
http://www.speedcafe.com/2016/10/26/new ... ing-shape/
New Commodore Supercar taking shape
"The new Commodore won’t be sold or raced with a V8"
New Commodore Supercar taking shape
"The new Commodore won’t be sold or raced with a V8"
Some play it safe on the merry-go-round, others go for the thrills of the roller-coaster.
ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ vs ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
I have a joke for you. I have a prediction that you are going to walk into a bar, my prediction was wrong and your wallet is gone.
ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ vs ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
I have a joke for you. I have a prediction that you are going to walk into a bar, my prediction was wrong and your wallet is gone.
- Shaun
- Posts: 3619
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:24 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: V8supercars 2016
Sigh not even a v8. I know I'm a bogan but ffs holden that is just shit
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Hello
- NeilPearson
- Prize Winning ARSE
- Posts: 7278
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Neil'sville
- Contact:
Re: V8supercars 2016
AWD to
- Shaun
- Posts: 3619
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 9:24 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: V8supercars 2016
I mine mean for the supercar. Road car is dead to me when that comes out lol. They couldve at least kept the supercar a v8
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Hello
- Dr. Pain
- Posts: 7431
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 4:17 pm
- Location: Benalla, Victoria
Re: V8supercars 2016
Really?! That?! How hard could it be?
You get the idea
You get the idea
Minister for Religious Genocide.
- NeilPearson
- Prize Winning ARSE
- Posts: 7278
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Neil'sville
- Contact:
Re: V8supercars 2016
west coast eagles comaro!
- w00dsy
- The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
- Posts: 24457
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
- Location: incognito
Re: V8supercars 2016
this might not seem like much, but it's probably the biggest team swap we've seen in many years. While the whole thing is a team effort, Lacroix is the genius behind 888's technical advantage. This is a massive get for Penske. It'd be like poaching Adrian Newey away from RBR. It'll be interesting to see if Sam Michaels can help them retain their speed.
Long-time Triple Eight technical director Ludo Lacroix is set to join DJR Team Penske in what shapes as one of the most significant recruitments in the category’s history.
The Queensland-based Holden squad announced this morning that Lacroix will leave Triple Eight following 17 years with the business across the United Kingdom and Australia.
Speedcafe.com has learned that the Frenchman is poised to join DJR Team Penske as it continues to build its emerging Supercars team.
DJRTP’s move to secure Lacroix follows a mixed first two seasons in the category under the team’s American ownership that is yet to yield a race win.
Its technical line-up is currently led by South Australian Nick Hughes, who was appointed to the technical director role by Penske when it bought a majority stake in the team late in 2014.
Penske then recruited race engineers Phil Keed (ex-Brad Jones Racing) and Adam De Borre (ex-Prodrive) over the 2015/16 off-season.
Lacroix’s exact place in the Penske structure remains unclear, with the team declining to comment on the Frenchman’s future when contacted by Speedcafe.com.
The veteran will undoubtedly add significant firepower to the squad which boasts extensive resources in both Australia and the United States.
Having returned to race engineering duties this year on Craig Lowndes’ Holden, speculation is rife that Lacroix will be paired with Penske’s new star driving recruit Scott McLaughlin.
Crucially, Lacroix’s defection from Triple Eight to Penske will come as Supercars teams prepare to design all-new cars for the category’s Gen2 era.
Lacroix was expected to head-up development of Holden’s new car next year ahead of its debut in 2018 as part of Triple Eight’s deal with the manufacturer.
He had previously designed the aero packages for the BF and FG Falcons during Triple Eight’s stint with Ford before also leading the development of the VF Commodore.
Penske is meanwhile yet-to-commit to a direction for Gen2 as it continues to bide its time with Ford.
Lacroix’s move to a rival team is sure to ruffle feathers at Triple Eight and comes little over three years since its team manager Adrian Burgess was poached by the Holden Racing Team.
Triple Eight principal Roland Dane is understood to have known of Lacroix’s intention to leave for some months, with plans to fill the breach already underway.
The team has announced the signing of ex-F1 technical chief Sam Michael in a part-time mentoring role and says that it will “roll out a number of new engineering appointments over the next three months”.
John McGregor is expected to take over Lacroix’s race engineering duties alongside Lowndes having worked closely with the pair throughout this season.
- pixelboy
- Posts: 8064
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:07 pm
- Location: Shitney
- Jiminee
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 pm
- Location: Whyalla Proud
Re: V8supercars 2016
GT4 as a series would make so much more sense than GT3 if we were to go in that direction - not that I see it happening but GT3 is on the verge of pricing itself out of existence and GT4 will take over.
XLV SPORT
- w00dsy
- The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
- Posts: 24457
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
- Location: incognito
Re: V8supercars 2016
They've always tried to have a strong local element so I doubt they'd ever go down that route.
- Jiminee
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:28 pm
- Location: Whyalla Proud
- w00dsy
- The Senna of Hoppers Crossing
- Posts: 24457
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 2:41 pm
- Location: incognito
Re: V8supercars 2016
No idea. Apart from the few years of Group A it's always been a category specific to Australia. Our guys tend to build their own cars, so the idea of importing ready made cars seems a bit pointless. The only other reason to run an international category is if someone wanted to go and run a car overseas. A couple of teams tried it in the Group A era, which was cool. Watching a Commodore belt around Monza, Spa etc was a bit of a highlight. But even NZ has its own categories. I suppose most countries do.